


|
 |
 |
-
What
is ERT?
ERT
pioneers the use of market forces to protect and improve the global
environment. Founded in 1996, with the help of Environmental
Defense, we
are focused exclusively on building markets that encourage private parties
to serve their own best interests and the best interests of the
environment.   ERT has three principal programs: the GHG RegistrySM
records
validated greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions profiles to help create a market that will enable efficient emissions reductions; the EcoPowerSM
Program catalyzes the market for clean energy by substantiating and marketing blocks of power that include new renewable sources of energy and
have significantly reduced environmental impacts; ERT's EcoLandsSM
Program enables and encourages landowners to make environmentally beneficial land
use decisions.
ERT
is not an advocacy organization
and has no political affiliation. We
are implementing economic ideas that address today’s environmental
challenges, using the organization’s non-profit status to take risks,
produce results, and publicize successes.
-
How
is ERT different from other environmental organizations?
While there are a number of organizations working in different ways to
address the same specific challenges as ERT – tempering climate change,
promoting clean energy and using lands in environmentally beneficial ways
– ERT is unique in its commitment to building markets in service of the
environment. We are, first and foremost, environmentalists,
committed to improving our global environment; to the best of our
knowledge, however, ERT is the only environmental organization solely
dedicated to enabling transactions between private parties that
demonstrate the potential for market-based environmental solutions and
develop the needed building blocks for well-functioning markets in service
of the environment – like improved access to information, a functional
market mechanism and lower transaction costs.
-
What
is the link between ERT and Environmental Defense?
ERT
was founded in 1996 with the help of Environmental
Defense
(then known as the Environmental Defense Fund or EDF). As an
advocacy organization, EDF has been a leader in advocating for
environmental policies that use economic incentives and market-based
instruments to bridge the gap between economic and environmental goals.
EDF also saw a need for an organization to work directly with private
parties in building markets in service of the environment. ERT
was created to fill that need.
Economists
Dan Dudek
and
Zach Willey, and attorney
Joe Goffman
of
Environmental
Defense
were the moving forces in launching ERT, and all three currently
serve on ERT’s board. As senior policy experts with Environmental
Defense, all three have done groundbreaking work on developing
market-based solutions to environmental challenges – Dan Dudek and Joe
Goffman were instrumental in creating the EPA’s sulfur dioxide emissions
cap and trading program, which has used the power of the market to
dramatically lower acid rain in the United States, faster and at a
fraction of the cost originally predicted; Zach Willey has been a leader
in developing markets that enable private land owners to use their land
and water rights in ways that protect the environment, especially fish and
wildlife habitat.
In the
past, Environmental Defense has provided financial support to ERT.
Also, given the organizations’ overlapping interests in promoting
market-based solutions to environmental challenges, ERT staff occasionally
consult and collaborate with Environmental Defense staff. However,
ERT is an independent organization and does not advocate on behalf of
Environmental Defense or any other organization.
-
Why
is ERT so focused on markets?
Because
markets are the most powerful economic organizing force ever created.
In the United States, our market-based economy has produced the highest
standard of living in the world. The power of markets has also been
employed successfully to improve the environment – the SO2
“cap-and-trade” system has dramatically and cost-effectively reduced
acid rain in the Northeastern United States; tradable fishing permits have
helped stem the problem of overfishing in certain U.S. fisheries; and a
market in tradable permits facilitated the phase-out of lead from
gasoline.
Markets are only a mechanism – a uniquely efficient mechanism – for
organizing and allocating resources, but they aren’t necessarily
inherently good for the environment. In fact, when there is no cost
to a particular activity, like polluting the air, markets ruthlessly
encourage participants to consume as much of that activity as they can.
That partly explains why Americans are also among the world’s most
significant polluters.
ERT is not focused on markets for the sake of markets. We believe
that the market is a powerful tool, one that can be harnessed for the
benefit of the environment. When we set our environmental goals and
properly allocate the costs of those goals, markets will achieve the goals
most effectively and efficiently, spurring innovation, rewarding leaders
and punishing laggards.
-
Can
free markets eliminate the need for government action to protect the
environment?
No.
There will always be an important role for government to play in
protecting the health of our environment, particularly where the
environmental interest at issue is a so-called “public good” – like
clean air or clean water. Market-oriented environmentalism, however,
requires us to rethink government’s role. In some cases,
government can enable markets that help improve the environment by
eliminating regulation – for example, by deregulating electricity
markets to allow new sources of electric energy, including clean,
renewable sources like wind and solar, to compete with the traditional,
dirty sources of power provided by government-created monopolist electric
utilities, government can enable the power of a competitive marketplace to
improve the environment.
Where
regulation is necessary, government can use market-oriented mechanisms to
encourage the most efficient, cost-effective environmental protection –
for example, instead of using traditional “command-and-control”
regulations to specify air pollution control technologies, government can
set a fixed cap on total permitted emissions of a specified pollutant,
then allow emitters to determine how best to meet that cap, including
allowing trading of emissions credits. A “cap-and-trade” system,
like the SO2 trading program employed to combat acid rain, encourages
innovation, allows the lowest-cost avoiders to capitalize on investments
to reduce their emissions below the capped limits and presses the profit
motive into action to spur investment in the environment.
-
Where
does ERT get its money to operate?
ERT
is a non-profit organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. ERT receives most of its operating revenue from
philanthropic organizations – for example, the Smith Richardson
Foundation, Great Lakes Protection Fund, Joyce Foundation and Sand County
Foundation/Bradley Fund for the Environment have been early and generous
supporters of ERT’s work.
Other
funding comes from fee-for-service revenue generated by each of the
Program Directors for their respective expertise, as well as from
brokering various transactions that improve the environment, e.g.,
advising municipalities on the purchase of clean power.
ERT
has also received generous support from individuals who support our work
in pioneering markets to improve the environment.
-
If
ERT is involved in profit-oriented markets, why is it a non-profit
organization?
Because
ERT gets involved in markets before they are markets. At the core of
our public purpose is ERT’s commitment to develop the necessary building
blocks for markets that will benefit the environment. Typically, we
perceive an environmental opportunity and become involved when
profit-oriented market participants still regard the profit opportunity as
too speculative.
The
essentials for a well-functioning market include:
-
Clearly identified property rights – e.g. a right, defined by
contract, to enforce sustainable forestry practices that will
sequester carbon, improve local water quality and/or protect animal
habitat
-
A
well-defined and fungible commodity – e.g. reductions in CO2
emissions
-
Generally
accepted measurement standards and verification principles – e.g.
methods to define and assure consumers of the environmental benefits
associated with producing clean power
-
Market
mechanism to enable buyers and sellers to transact – e.g. a
registry that records and tracks CO2 emissions reductions and
facilitates trading
-
Broadly
available, reliable sources of information – e.g. publicly
accessible information about availability, comparative attributes and
price of clean power
-
Standardized
forms and practices that minimize transaction costs – e.g. contracts
for changes in land use that allow landowners to monetize the benefits
of ecological services provided to others
Working
with philanthropic support from individuals and foundations, ERT
identifies the missing pieces of a well-functioning market and brings
together interested public and private parties to begin filling in those
pieces. Once the market is up and running smoothly with plenty of
for-profit participants, ERT’s mission is fulfilled, and we move on to a
new, environmental “proto-market.”
-
How
do ERT's programs reflect its mission?
ERT’s three principal programs are developing markets that will
efficiently and cost-effectively address identified environmental
challenges. The
GHG RegistrySM
records validated greenhouse gas (“GHG”)
emissions profiles to help create a market that will enable efficient
emissions reductions – working with private and public entities, ERT is
developing a common currency in tradable GHG emissions reductions,
supported by standardized measurement and verification protocols; the
GHG RegistrySM
provides an independent verification and tracking service that
enables market participants to track and trade emissions reductions with
confidence. ERT believes that the emissions trading system its
GHG RegistrySM
is enabling will be a powerful tool in reducing global
greenhouse gas emissions without crippling economic growth and
development.
The
EcoPowerSM
Program catalyzes the market for clean energy by substantiating
and marketing blocks of power that include new renewable sources of energy
and have significantly reduced environmental impacts. As states
deregulate electricity markets, allowing consumers to choose their sources
of electricity supply, consumers can begin to enjoy the benefits of
reliable, stably-priced and clean electricity. But in a world where
choice has never before been available, and where the electrons that flow
into homes and businesses cannot be identified to a particular source,
there is a dearth of reliable information necessary to support a
well-functioning market. By defining an electricity product with
specified environmental benefits –
EcoPowerSM
– educating consumers
about their clean power options and substantiating the associated
environmental benefits, ERT is helping to develop a mature, robust market
for clean and sustainable energy generation.
ERT's EcoLandsSM
Program enables and encourages landowners to make
environmentally beneficial land use decisions. Often, landowners are
locked into marginally profitable uses of their land – farming, ranching
or logging – because they have no way of identifying and capitalizing on
the potential market value of the environmental services their land could
provide. For example, planting trees on riparian farm and ranchland
improves the river’s water quality by providing an absorbing buffer for
nitrogen and other agricultural nutrients deposited on other parts of the
farm; it improves fish and wildlife habitat; finally, the growing trees
absorb CO2 and sequester carbon, providing an important sink to offset
CO2
emissions elsewhere (and to the extent the converted lands were being
actively farmed and fertilized, the conversion also reduces GHG emissions
in the form of N20, a fertilizer component). For each of those
ecological services, there are potential buyers – point source polluters
who need to offset their own emissions into the river, fishing and hunting
organizations interested in improving wildlife habitat, and GHG emitters
who need to reduce their net emissions through purchased offsets. ERT is working with landowners to identify and quantify potential
ecological services from their lands, to identify prospective purchasers
for those ecological services and to structure private-exchange
transactions that capitalize on those benefits.
-
How
does ERT measure the success of its programs?
We
measure our success one transaction at a time. Every time we get two
(or more) private parties together to exchange goods or services in a way
that is in the mutual best interests of the parties and in the best
interest of the environment, we count a success. And with each
success we add to our own learning and to a smoothly functioning market
with wide access to critical information, a functional market mechanism
and low transaction costs. Ultimately, of course, we hope that the
private sector, with or without the involvement of public policymakers,
will embrace, promote and sustain permanent markets that improve and
protect our global environment.
-
What
are ERT's messages?
ERT
believes that with proper regulation, markets are an efficient and
cost-effective way to improve the environment
U.S.
EPA’s SO2 cap and trade system was very successful at
curbing acid rain.
Fishing
permit trading gave marginal fisherman start-up capital to switch
occupations.
Lead
permit trading allowed the phase out of leaded gasoline without
leading to a shortage.
Because
developing environmental markets - creating infrastructure and
pioneering transactions - is cost-intensive to early movers, ERT, a
not-for-profit, shepherds the private sector through the initial
phases of development. ERT currently is focused on providing
market-development services in three environmental areas.
The
GHG RegistrySM
records validated emissions profiles to
help create a market that will enable efficient GHG emissions
reductions.
The
EcoPowerSM
Program catalyzes the market for clean
energy by substantiating and marketing blocks of clean power that
contain new renewable sources of energy and have significantly
reduced environmental impacts.
ERT’s
EcoLandsSM
Program enables and encourages landowners to
make environmentally beneficial land-use decisions.
ERT
is not an advocacy organization, but it does publicize its successes
for the private sector, policy makers and its funders to see.
|